- 16.1
The standard error is 9.3/5.2 = 1.788.
- 16.2
The standard deviation is 1.732*.01 = .01732
- 16.3
- a) 2.015
- b) 2.518
- 16.5
- a) 2.262
- b) 2.861
- c) 1.440
- 16.6
0 | 7 |
1 | |
2 | |
3 | 5 |
4 | 9 0 |
5 | 5 |
6 | |
7 | 4 0 |
8 | 4 1 |
A 90% t confidence interval for the mean percent change in
blood polyphenols is (3.94, 7.06).
- 16.8
- a) There are 14 degrees of freedom.
- b) Two critical values that bracket t=1.82 are 1.761 and
2.145 with right-tail probabilities .05 and .025 respectively.
- c) The p-value for this test is between .05 and .025.
- 16.9
- a) There are 24 degrees of freedom.
- b) 1.12 falls between 1.059 (p=0.15) and 1.318 (p=.10).
- c) Since the test is two sided, the p-value is between
0.3 and 0.2.
- d) The value t=1.12 is not significant at the 10%
level or the 5% level.
- 16.11
- a) The students should be randomly assigned which instrument
to use first.
- b) μ is the mean paired difference in time it
takes a subject to move the indicator a fixed distance via left-hand or
right-hand thread.
H0: μ=0. There is no difference in
time between the left-hand and right-hand thread instruments.
Ha: μ> 0. The it takes longer to use
the left-hand thread instrument than the right-hand thread instruemnt.
- c) The test statistic t=2.9037 with 24 degrees of
freedom has a p-value of .0039. We will reject
H0: μ=0 and conclude that it does take longer
to use the left-hand thread instrument.
- 16.13 A 90% confidence interval for the mean time advantage
of right-hand over left-hand threads is (5.47, 21.17) seconds. The
mean time for right-hand thread is 104.1, which is 88.7% of the mean
time for left-hand thread. This seems to a practically significant
difference.
- 16.14
- a) H0: μD=0.
On average there is no difference between the growth of trees in the
control plots and the growth of the trees in the matched treated
plots.
Ha: μD>0.
On average growth of the trees in the control plots is less than the
growth of the trees in the matched treated plots.
The alternative is one-sided because the question of interest is
whether or not the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere is likely
to result in an increase of plant growth.
- b) t = 1.92/(1.05/1.732) = 3.17. The p-value for t=3.17 with
two degrees of freedom is between .05 and .025. This test is
significant at the .05 level. There is a less than 5% chance that the
observed differences were due to random variation with no true
difference.
- c) The sample size is very small, so it is not possible to
check the important assumption of Normality.
- 16.16
- a) H0: μ=0; there is no difference
in the amount charged when no credit card fee is charged.
Ha: μ>0; customers charge more when no
credit card fee is charged.
(332-0)/(108/14.14) = 43.47, so the p-value is less than .0005
This is significant at the 1% level.
- b) 332 ± 2.626 * 108/14.14 = (311.94 ,352.06) is a
conservative 99% confidence interval for the mean amount of increase.
- c) The sample size is larger than 40, so the t
procedures should be okay to use.
- d) Cardholders could be randomly assigned to receive the
no-fee offer or not. In this case, the design would not be a matched
pair design, but it would remove the problem of confounding economic
changes between years.
- 16.18 The critical value for 99% confidence given a
t-distribution with 667 degrees of freedom is 2.583, so A 99%
confidence interval for the mean number of unexcused absences for all
workers is given by 9.88 ± 2.583 * 17.847/25.83 or (8.10, 11.66).
- 16.26 A 95% confidence interval for the mean HAV angle is
given by 25.42 ± 2.021 * 7.47/6.16 or (22.97, 27.87).
- 16.27
- a) 24.76 ± 2.021 * 6.34/6.08 or (22.7, 26.9).
- b) In this case the most important effect of removing the
outlier seems to be a reduction in width of the interval.
- 16.31
- b) A 95% confidence interval for the mean length of great
white sharks is (14.81, 16.36). This implies that we would reject
the claim that great white sharks have an average length of 20 feet at
the 5% level.
- c) It is necessary to know the population from which the
sample was drawn.