- 19.1
- a) 27/56 = 48.2% of the women feel vulnerable while
46/63 = 73% of the men feel vulnerable.
- b) A 95% confidence interval for the difference is given
by (.73 - .482) ± 1.96 * .0871, or (.0773, .4187).
- 19.3
- a) There were not enough "successes" at Wahtonka High School.
(7 < 10), so the large-sample confidence interval should not be
used.
- b) 8 drug users and 137 athletes at Wahtonka and 28 users
out of 143 athletes at Warrenton.
- c) A 95% confidence interval for the difference is given by
(.0614, .2134).
- 19.5 H0: prt=
pnt, the proportion of athletes that abuse drugs
under a random testing policy is the same as the proportion who abuse
drugs under a no testing policy.
Ha: prt<pnt,
the proportion of athletes that abuse drugs under a random testing
policy is less than the proportion who abuse drugs under a no testing
policy.
The test statistic is -3.53 and the p-value is .0002.
The proportion of athletes who abuse drugs is significantly lower among
those who are randomly tested than those who are not.
- 19.7 H0: pA=
pE, the proportion of African miners who died was
equal to the proportion of European miners who died.
Ha: pA>pE, the
proportion of African miners who died was greater than the proportion of
European miners who died.
The test statistic is .98 and the p-value is .16, so there is not
a significant difference between the proportion of African and European
miners who died.
- 19.8
- a) A 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all adults
who use the internet is (.6091, .6505).
- b) A 95% confidence interval for the difference in the
proportion of non-users and users who expect business to have Web sites
that give product information is (.3693, .4506).
- 19.9
H0 p1-p2= 0: the proportion of
rejected papers without statistical help (p1) is equal to the
proportion of rejected papers with statistical help (p2).
Ha p1-p2≠ 0: the proportion of
rejected papers without statistical help (p1) is not equal to the
proportion of rejected papers with statistical help (p2).
z = 3.39, with p-value < .0005. There is strong evidence for a difference
between rejection rates of papers with no statistical help versus those with statistical
help.
- 19.10 A 95% confidence interval for the proportion of papers submitted
that include help from a statistician is (0.527, 0.613).
- 19.11 A 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of
papers rejected without review when a statistician is and is not involved in the research
is (.063, .218).
- 19.14
- a) This is an observational study. There was no manipulation
of the explanatory variable (city) by the researchers.
- b) The proportion of New York female Hispanic drivers who
wore their seatbelts was 0.829, while the proportion of Boston female
Hispanic drivers who wore their seatbelts was 0.570.
H0: pB=
pNY, Boston and New York have the same rate of
seatbelt use
H a: pB<pNY,
smaller proportion of Boston drivers wear seatbelts.
The test statistic is 5.024, the p-value is less than .0001.
There is strong evidence that fewer Hispanic female drivers in Boston
wear seatbelts.
- 19.21
H0: pm-pf=0, there is no difference
in failure rates between stores headed by men and stores headed by women.
Ha: pm-pf=0, there is a
difference in failure rates between stores headed by men and stores headed by women.
z = -.388, p-value > .5, so there is not significant difference in the failure
rates of stores headed by men and stores headed by women.
- 19.23 see solution in textbook
- 19.25
- a) The proportion of businesses owned by women that failed is
.167. The proportion of business owned by men that failed is .151.
The p-value for the test is .713.
- b) The proportions are the same, but the p-value is now
.0336, so it is significant at the α=.05 level.
- c) The 95% confidence interval (plus four method) for part
(a) is (-.157, .109). The 95% confidence interval for part (b) is
(-.049, -.0013). The increased sample size results in a smaller
confidence interval.